The underlying crime of first-degre

The underlying crime of first-degree assault required proof that the principal (i.e., the husband) acted recklessly with respect to the result. And the court held that the wife's complicity_could not be premised on recklessness. proofing that defendant intended to cause the injury or the death, even though the underlying crime requires proof of only a lesser culpable mental state.

Results (Chinese Traditional) 1:

一級攻擊所需的證明，委託人（即丈夫）相對於結果魯莽行事的潛在犯罪。而法院認為，妻子的complicity_could不是魯莽為前提。校對被告意圖造成人身傷害或死亡，即使底層的犯罪只需要較小的有罪心理狀態的證明。

Results (Chinese Traditional) 2:

一級攻擊的基本罪行要求證明校長（即丈夫）對結果魯莽行事。法院認為，妻子complicity_could不是以魯莽為前提的。證明被告意圖造成傷害或死亡，即使基礎犯罪只需要證明較輕的應受罪的精神狀態。 ...

Results (Chinese Traditional) 3:

一級襲擊的基本罪行需要證明，校長（即丈夫）對結果採取了魯莽的行動。法院認為，妻子的同謀不能以魯莽為前提。證明被告意圖造成傷害或死亡的證據，即使潜在的罪行只需要證明一個較輕的可犯罪的精神狀態。