first year there was a review of de

first year there was a review of developments and some monitoring in relation to success criteria but these were fairly rudimentary and varied in sophistication depending on the experience and skills of the member of staff
whose responsibility it had been. In the second cycle there was more
active bidding for funds, priorities and more developed procedures for
monitoring and evaluating developments. Some collaborative efforts with
other schools were also incorporated, in at least one instance being part
funded by an LEA initiative involving pupil self-assessment of work and
setting of learning targets; these widened expertise of staff and brought in
new ideas simultaneously.

Results (English) 3:

第一年有一个审查的发展和一些监测有关的成功标准，但这些是相当基本的，不同的复杂性取决于员工的经验和技能这是谁的责任。在第二个周期中有更多的积极争取资金，优先权和更发达的程序监测和评价发展。一些合作努力其他学校也被纳入，至少有一个实例是部分的由学生自我评价的工作学习的主动性和学习目标的制定；这些拓宽了员工的专业知识，并带来了同时新思路。