Im strengen gedanklichen Argumentie

Im strengen gedanklichen Argumentieren, das eigentlich nicht Goethes Naturell
entsprach, ist Schillers Einfluss anzunehmen, der ihm sicher auch im „redlichen
Bemühen“ um Maß, Form und sittliche Vervollkommnung voraus war. Das Sonett
zeigt Goethes Fähigkeit, unterschiedliche Positionen zu verbinden: Während Schiller
das Romantische rundweg ablehnte, setzte sich Goethe auf seine spielerisch
anmutende, anschauliche, ironisch distanzierte Weise mit Zeitströmungen wie der
Sonett-Mode auseinander.

Results (English) 1:

In the strict intellectual reasoning, the actually not Goethe's naturecorresponded, Schiller's influence is to think of him in the "bonaWas effort' to size, shape, and moral improvement ahead. The sonnetshows Goethe's ability to combine different positions: while Schillerthe romantic flatly rejected Goethe sat on his playfulseemingly, vivid, ironically distanced way with trends such as theSonnet fashion apart.

Results (English) 2:

In strict intellectual reasoning, which actually is not Goethe's temperament
corresponded, Schiller is to influence, even in the "bona fide him safely
effort" to size, form and moral perfection was ahead. The sonnet
shows Goethe's ability to connect different positions: While Schiller
the romantic refused flatly, Goethe put his playful
-looking, intuitive, ironically distanced manner with time flows like
apart sonnet mode.

Results (English) 3:

in the strict logic, argue that not his dispositionwhich is schiller"s influence, to adopt him and „redlichenseek "to measure, form and moral improvement ahead. the sonnetshows his ability to combine different positions: while schillerthe romantic flatly rejected, goethe in his playfulappearance, vivid, ironic distancing way with zeitströmungen assonnet mode apart.