Люди стремятся переходить на те язы

Люди стремятся переходить на те языки, функции которых более универсальны и разнообразны, — эта тенденция была всегда и сейчас только усиливается.
Сокращение числа языков происходит потому, что мир глобализуется, становится единым, и при этом в нём образуется один главный центр влияния. Раньше таких центров было много, и в разных участках планеты они существовали автономно. А сейчас на всю планету остаётся только один. Своё влияние он осуществляет, естественно, с помощью языка. И таким образом этот язык — речь, конечно, об английском — становится языком всего человечества. Очень многим людям очень многие действия становится привычнее осуществлять именно на английском языке: например, вести торговые переговоры, или писать научные статьи, или исполнять песни... Даже крупные языки, на которых когда-то вся эта деятельность была возможна, сейчас отступают перед английским, что же говорить о таких языках, которые и вовсе никогда не выполняли таких функций. Люди стремятся переходить на те языки, функции которых более универсальны и разнообразны, — эта тенденция была всегда и сейчас только усиливается.
Сохранится ли такое положение в будущем, мы не знаем. Если не сохранится, то в мире будет господствовать не английский, а, например, китайский, или хинди, или индонезийский, или арабский. Тут очень сложно делать прогнозы. Но в любом случае, если мир будет оставаться единым, то и разных языков в нём будет с каждым десятилетием всё меньше.
Иными словами, языков становится меньше не потому, что сами эти языки как-то меняются, например, упрощаются (в эволюции языка всё устроено намного сложнее), а просто потому, что люди не хотят говорить на «малых» и функционально бедных языках, а хотят говорить на крупных и функционально универсальных. Так людям удобнее: слабые стремятся говорить на языке сильных, чтобы стать сильнее самим. И дело совсем не в том, что какие-то языки изначально лучше приспособлены для «глобального» общения, это чистая политика, чистая социология. Ключ к этой проблеме в том, как устроен современный мир, а не как устроены отдельные языки: в структурном отношении каждый из языков человечества имеет все предпосылки для того, чтобы стать мировым. Но достаётся эта роль немногим. Или одному. Но один-единственный язык на всю планету — это всё-таки точно не завтра!»

Results (English) 1:

People tend to go to those languages which are more versatile and diverse — this trend was always and now only intensifies.Reduction in the number of languages is because the world is globalized, becomes one, and it is a major centre of influence. Previously, there were many such centers, and in different parts of the world they existed autonomously. And now for the rest of the planet is only one. Their influence he has, naturally, through language. And so the language is there, of course, about the English is becoming the language of all humanity. Many people are very accustomed to getting much of what it is in English: for example, to conduct trade negotiations, or to write scientific articles, or perform songs ... Even the major languages that once all this was possible, now retreat before the English that we talk about these languages and was never performed such functions. People tend to go to those languages which are more versatile and diverse — this trend was always and now only intensifies.Whether such a situation in the future, we don't know. If not continued, the world will be dominated by English, and not, for example, Chinese or Hindi or English, or Arabic. It is very difficult to make predictions. But in any case, if the world will remain unified, and different languages there will be less and less with each decade.In other words, language is becoming less, not because these languages somehow change, for example, easier (in the evolution of language is arranged much more difficult), and simply because people don't want to talk to "small" and feature-poor language, and want to speak to a large and functionally uniform. So people friendlier: weak to speak the language of the strong to get stronger yourself. And it's not that some languages are inherently better suited for "global" communicating, this is pure politics, pure sociology. The key to this issue is, how does the modern world, not how are individual languages: in each of the languages of humanity has all the prerequisites to become a world. But struggling this role a little. Or one. But the only language on the whole planet is still not exactly tomorrow! "

Results (English) 2:

People tend to move to those languages ​​whose functions are more versatile and varied - this trend has always been and now is only strengthened.
Reducing the number of languages ​​is because the globalized world, becomes one, and while there formed a major center of influence. Previously, there were many such centers, and in different parts of the world they existed independently. And now on the planet there is only one. Its influence he exercises, of course, with the help of language. And so the language - it is, of course, about the English - language becomes all mankind. So many people so many action becomes accustomed to exercise it in English, for example, to conduct trade negotiations, or to write research papers, or sing songs ... Even the major languages ​​that once all this activity was possible, now giving way to English that we talk about these languages, which were never carried out such functions. People tend to move to those languages ​​whose functions are more versatile and varied - this trend has always been and now is only strengthened.
Will I lose this situation in the future, we do not know. If you do not continue, the world will not dominate the English, and, for example, Chinese or Hindi or Indonesian or Arabic. It is very difficult to make predictions. But in any case, if the world will remain united, the different languages ​​and there will be with each decade smaller.
In other words, the language becomes less, not because they themselves these languages ​​somehow vary, for example, simplified (in the evolution of language all arranged much more difficult), but simply because people do not want to speak on "small" and poor functional languages, and want to speak to large and functionally universal. So it is more convenient for people: the weak tend to speak the language strengths to become stronger ourselves. And it is not that some languages ​​are inherently better suited to a "global" communication, it is pure politics, pure sociology. The key to this problem is what's inside the modern world, not how to construct separate languages: structurally each of the languages ​​of mankind has all the prerequisites to become the world. But this gets a little role. Or one. But only one language on the planet - it's still not exactly tomorrow! "

Results (English) 3:

Those languages people desire, has the versatility and the function of greater diversity, the trend is always and now only intensified.
reduces the number of occurrence of t le energy-saving. To me, a Le E and C language because of the world,Become a unified, and its center to form a major influence. Before the center so many, and in different locations, their autonomous existence of planets. And now there is only one in the whole planet.Your natural influence, he, through language. So the language and English speech, of course, as a universal language.Many people are very much of the action become growth training English: for example, trade negotiations, or write academic papers, or perform songs... Even greater language,When a person's entire activity is possible, in English now retreat, the same talk about these languages, these languages and never did perform such functions. Those languages people longed for,The function is more widespread and diverse, this trend is always and now only intensified.
will continue to maintain this situation in the future, we don't know. If you do not continue,Will dominate, in the world of a non English, Chinese, for example, or, or Hindi, Indonesian, or arabic. Prediction is very difficult to do in here. But in any case, if the world will maintain unity,He will be with people of different languages in each of the ten years less.
- in other words, the language itself has become more and more small, not because the language changes, for example,(all work to simplify the language in the process of the evolution of the much more complex), but simply because people don't want to say "a PI hallux were only and poor function of language, and I would like to say big and function of the general.So people are keen to speak English more convenient: the weak strong, make you stronger. Not to say what language is more suitable for the characters of "Le energy-saving society. And from von I initial communication, this is pure policy,Pure sociology. The key to solve this problem is, how the operation of the modern world, rather than a separate language: in structure is provided with a premise that each human of all languages, in order to become the world's.But, uh, this role is slightly. Or a. However, one is the only language in the entire planet are absolutely not tomorrow! "