One generalization drawn from our r

One generalization drawn from our review is that the majority
of Southeast Asian forest biodiversity is negatively affect by forest
disturbance, thus preserving and protecting large tracts of mature
forests should be the principal conservation strategy (see also Sodhi
et al., in press a,b). However, forest remnants in human-modified
landscapes can be augmented through reforestation,
reintroductions, implementation of corridors and upgrading of
their protected status to increase their conservation value. Clearly,
better logging practices, with longer rotation cycles, incorporation
of specific biodiversity guidelines for timber concessions and preservation
of remnants in logged forests as source populations are
needed (Dennis et al., 2008). In order to ameliorate the effects of
agricultural expansion on biodiversity in surrounding protected
areas, existing certification guidelines (e.g. by the Roundtable for
Sustainable Palm Oil [RSPO] and International Coffee Organization
[ICO]) need to be improved (e.g. RSPO indicators relevant to wildlife
protection should be better identified) and enforced

Results (Thai) 3:

一般从我们的研究的结论是，东南亚森林生物多样性的大多数
影响森林
干扰，从而保护了大片成熟的
林应该是主要的保护策略（参见该
等人。，在按下一个，B）。然而，在人类修改的森林遗迹，可以增强通过重新造林，回归自然，实现走廊和
保护措施升级，提高他们的保护价值。显然，更好的日志记录的做法，更长的旋转周期，注册成立的具体的生物多样性准则的木材特许权和保存的残余在记录的森林作为源的人口是必要的（丹尼斯等人，2008）。为了改善
周边地区生物多样性保护
农业扩张的影响，现有的认证指南（例如通过圆桌会议为
可持续棕榈油圆桌会议]和[国际咖啡组织
[意]）需要改进（野生动物保护相关的如
RSPO指标应该更好的确定）和执行