Vietnam is in the period of transit

Vietnam is in the period of transition to socialism, economic development problems being faced by the entire Party people. The development of the economy with the leadership of the Party and State's management plays a very important role. Experiencing a period persevere with the path to socialism, the Party and State have drawn the lessons learned for the development of the country in general and the development of the economy in particular. Since the country gained independence, our country's economy has gone through different periods: - From 1945 to 1954: Wartime economy - From 1954 to 1975: building socialism in the North as the post the southern firmly against America. - 1975: Focus remedial war and make the transition to socialism in the country, which has for a long time the country into a situation of economic crisis by nature economy subsidized, bureaucracy. Since the Congress of the VI the National Party has driven innovative economic management mechanism, and the Congress of the VII the National Party went to build the development direction of the economy Composite goods oriented socialism, operating under the market mechanism is the management of the State. Experiencing the ups and downs, so far, Vietnam's economy continues to grow and the annual gain significant achievements, contributing to building the country stronger and prosperous. However, the challenge for Vietnam's economy still exists, by the period of transition to socialism is the period arduous struggle, complex between the working class allied with the class and floors Other labor class (mainly farmers and intellectuals) with a side of the exploiting class and reactionary forces residues have not been completely demolished. For the above reasons, I decided to choose thesis "Characteristics of Vietnam's economy in the period of transition to socialism (from 1975 to present)".
The period of transition to socialism in view of Marxism - Leninism and Marxism According Angghen, morphology communist socioeconomic development from low to high in 2 stages, from the socialist period (follow performance force, entitled to under labor) over the period of communism (as according to ability, awarded on request). Transition is the first step, in the low period of socialism, ie the period between capitalism and socialism transformation, building premises for socialism. Capitalism and socialism fundamentally different, manifested in: Capitalism is oppression and exploitation regime, exist based on private ownership of means of production, social classes antagonistic contradiction; Socialism is the regime also abolished oppression and exploitation, the property regime of the means of production and the class in society without antagonism. Therefore, a period from capitalism to socialism gradually shift is necessary. Time for transition does not have limits, but as Lenin said, "should have a transitional period is quite long" or Lenin compare it to "the prolonged birth pangs" by nature complex and its arduous struggle. The transition must depend on the starting point, the level of development of each country, and the strength of ideas and the leadership of the working class in this country. When analyzing the characteristics and the nature of capitalism, Marx and Angghen have raised possibility of transition to Communism in backward countries money capitalism. Later, Lenin made this argument legacy of Marx and Angghen, while analyzing the possibility to specify transitional ignore capitalism. The advance towards socialism took place within each individual country or countries, may not take place simultaneously worldwide. When was the victory of socialism in one country, this will make the premise for other countries in transition to socialism, including the backward countries, by this time, the era of transition to socialism worldwide was opened.
From 1975 to now, the economy in the transition period of Vietnam has gone through two phases: - Phase 1 (from 1975 to 1986): command economy focused nature of bureaucracy, subsidies . - Phase 2 (from 1986): commodity economy under the socialist-oriented components, operating under the market mechanism with the administration of the State (called the market economy socialist orientation ). I. Phase 1 (from 1975 to 1986) During this period, the management structure of our country's economy is centrally planned; Accordingly, the economy is the economy survive the orders and command. Party and State accepts only two economic sectors: state economic sectors and economic sectors collectively. The private sector is not allowed to exist and operate. The economy of a country reflects the relationship between the relations of production and productive forces. The development of the economy is also reflected in the compatibility of the two factors. In our country this stage, while the forces of production is still on the uneven development, small craft production is common, the level of division of labor and very low socialization, we re-build command economy, commander stifle economic growth engine, not exploit social production capacity. The State only priority focus for the economic protection of state and collective economy, considering two economic sectors in the socialist economy, while other economic sectors considered germ of capitalism should be removed altogether. At the Congress of the IV th National Party in 1976, our Party has been determined based on the path of economic development policies of the country, including a few notable following: "Promote socialist industrialization, construction of socialist material and technical, given our country's economy from small producers to large socialist production, construction mode socialist collective ownership. Prioritize the development of heavy industry in a reasonable manner on the basis of development of agriculture and light industry ... ". However, the determination target first stage of the transitional period of the party is not clear, moreover, the party made a mistake in determining the pace of construction of technical infrastructure, on improving socialist, on the application of economic management structures ... While the technical infrastructure was poor, backward technology, our country still rely on agriculture as the main, the Party advocated the development of heavy industry. This does not fit with the real situation. We were too hasty in transition. Our country is starting from a pre-capitalist countries progress to socialism, so the level of development of productive forces is very low, need to undergo many small transitions. But we are made right the path of development as a country with a highly developed economy. This is not true of the rule of historical development. Generally during this period, due to historical conditions, we have reproduced stereotyped model of social-economic development and economic management structure of the socialist countries. Have to say, the economy dictates - commanding nature centralized bureaucracy and subsidies are appropriate to the circumstances of war; by that time and the largest overall objectives of the country was complete national democratic revolutionary people and liberated the country to carry out a socialist revolution. Therefore, the focus manpower for the war effort of the cause is essential. That makes tremendous power of the whole people; quickly complete the national democratic revolutionary people toward a socialist revolution. However, when the country won unity, the transition is done in the country, economy centrally planned is no longer consistent with national circumstances. It raises cultural bureaucracy, and this has negatively affected the entire economic development and society. Economic development of passive and inflexible, the resources are not fully exploited, production inefficiencies due to the rigid way of working ... and consequence are 1979 and 1985-1986, the economy - our society fall into crisis: severe inflation (the highest was 1985 with the inflation rate of 600%), stagnant production, scarcity of goods, prices are skyrocketing, life of very hard workers ... This has created tremendous pressure on the country's development. Therefore, the renewal process is started immediately from this pressure. In the Platform for national construction in the transition to socialism (1991), the Party has shown the cause of the mistakes in this stage: "Party made the mistake of subjective voluntarism, violate rules objective: hasty in socialist reform, removing even more components economy; Excessive levels accelerate the development of heavy industry; too long mechanism to maintain centralized management bureaucracy, subsidies; issuevarious wrong in reforming pricing, currency, wages ... ". It was a lesson summed up the Party's leadership period for the development of the country in general and the economy in particular

Results (English) 3:

越南正处于向社会主义过渡时期，全党人民面临的经济发展问题。经济的发展与党的领导和国家的管理起着非常重要的作用。经历一个时期坚持走社会主义道路，党和国家从总体上吸取了国家发展的经验教训，特别是经济的发展。自国家独立以来，我国的经济经历了不同时期的发展：从1945到1954：战时经济从1954到1975：建设社会主义在北方，作为后南坚决反对美国。•1975：把重点救济战争，使国家过渡到社会主义，这已久的国家陷入经济危机的自然经济补贴，官僚机构。第六届全国人大代表大会推动创新经济管理机制，而第七届全国代表大会又一届的发展方向是建设经济复合型商品的社会主义，在市场机制下运作是国家的管理。经历了跌宕起伏，到目前为止，越南的经济继续增长，并取得了显著的成就，有助于建设国家富强。然而，对越南经济的挑战依然存在，由过渡到社会主义的时期是一段艰辛的斗争，工人阶级与阶级之间的复杂关系（主要是农民和知识分子）与剥削阶级和反动势力的残余没有完全被摧毁。上述原因，我决定选择论文“在向社会主义过渡的时期，越南的经济特征（从1975到现在）”。
在马克思列宁主义和马克思主义angghen观向社会主义的过渡时期，共产主义社会经济形态的发展从低到高的2个阶段，从社会主义时期（按照表现力，在共产主义时期（根据要求）在共产主义时期享有的权利。转型是社会主义的第一步，在社会主义的低时期，即资本主义与社会主义的转型，为社会主义建设。资本主义与社会主义本质上的不同，表现在：资本主义是压迫和剥削的制度，以私有制为基础的生产方式，社会阶级对立的矛盾；社会主义的制度也被废除了压迫和剥削，财产制度的生产手段和阶级在社会中没有对立。因此，从资本主义到社会主义的一个时期，逐渐转变是必要的。过渡时期没有限制，但正如列宁所说，“应该有一个过渡期很长，”列宁把它比作“长时间的阵痛”的性质复杂、艰巨的斗争。转型必须取决于每个国家的起点、发展水平、思想的力量和在这个国家的领导阶层。在分析资本主义的本质特征，马克思和angghen提出落后国家货币资本主义过渡到共产主义的可能性。后来，列宁进行了讨论马克思的遗产和angghen可能性的分析，而忽略指定过渡的资本主义。社会主义在每个国家和国家都发生了，可能不会在全球范围内发生。在一个国家的社会主义的胜利，这将使其他国家在过渡到社会主义，包括落后国家，在这个时候，在世界范围内的过渡时期开放，从1975到现在，越南经济在过渡时期已经经历了两期：•1期（从1975到1986）：指令经济的性质，官僚机构，补贴。-阶段2（1986）：商品经济下的社会主义主导的组成部分，在市场机制下经营的国家（称为市场经济的社会主义方向）。一期1（1986至1975），我国经济的管理体制是中央计划的，因此，经济是经济生存的命令和命令。党和国家只接受经济部门：国家经济部门和经济部门的集体。私人部门是不允许存在和经营。一个国家的经济反映了生产与生产力之间的关系。经济的发展也体现在两者的相容性方面。在我国现阶段，虽然生产的力量仍处于不平衡的发展，小工艺的生产是普遍的，劳动分工水平和社会化程度很低，我们重新构建指挥经济，指挥官扼杀经济增长发动机，不发挥社会生产能力。国家对国家和集体经济的经济保护，只考虑经济部门在社会主义经济中的重点，而其他经济部门认为资本主义的萌芽应完全取消。在1976届全国人大代表大会上，我们党在确定国家的经济发展政策的基础上，主要包括以下几个方面的内容：“推进社会主义工业化，建设社会主义物质技术，将我国的经济从小生产者到大的社会主义生产，社会主义集体所有制。以农业和轻工业的发展为基础，以合理的方式优先发展重工业……”但是，党的过渡时期的确定指标还不清楚，而且党在确定技术基础设施建设的步伐上犯了一个错误，论经济管理体制在经济管理中的应用…技术基础设施落后，技术落后，我国仍以农业为主，党主张发展重工业。这不符合实际情况。我们在过渡期太匆忙。我国正从资本主义国家开始走向社会主义，所以生产力发展水平很低，需要进行许多小过渡。但我们作为一个经济高度发达的国家，我们的发展道路是正确的。这不是真实的历史发展规律。一般在这一时期，由于历史条件，我们已经复制了社会经济发展和社会主义国家经济管理体制的定型模式。不得不说，经济使然--指挥性、集权式的官僚制和补贴是适合战争情况的；到那个时候，国家最大的总体目标是完成了全国人民民主革命人民解放了社会主义革命。因此，重点人力的战争精力的事业是必不可少的。这使得全人类的巨大力量，很快完成了全国民主革命人民走向社会主义革命。但是，当国家赢得了统一，在国家的转型是在国家，经济的中央计划不再符合国家的情况。它引发了文化官僚，这对整个经济发展和社会都产生了不利的影响。经济发展的消极和不灵活，资源没有充分利用，