柏拉图（本文中柏拉图也可用苏格拉底代替，暂且略过两人的差别）的《理想国

柏拉图（本文中柏拉图也可用苏格拉底代替，暂且略过两人的差别）的《理想国》是从"什么是正义？"这一问题开始讨论的，即探讨正义的定义。首先驳斥了关于正义的几个错误定义，如"正义就是欠债还钱"，"正义就是给每个人以恰如其分的报答"，"正义就是强者的立义"，可正义的定义仍然不得而知。柏拉图随即改变了考查的方法，将自己的视线放到了城邦，希望能够在城邦中找到一个较大的正义，然后再考查个人身上较小的正义，由此看清楚真正的正义。为了这个目的，柏拉图构建了自己的理想国。在此隐含着一个前提，即正义的概念是普适的，对于城邦和人是一样的。对于古典政治哲学家来说这样的前提似乎是理所当然的成立，因为他们追求的就是普遍的理念。

Results (English) 1:

Plato (Socrates, Plato can also be used in the article instead, let us skip the two differences) the Republic is "what is justice? "This issue started to discuss, and definition of Justice. First, rejected definition just a few mistakes, such as "justice and debts repaid", "justice is to give everyone proper reward", "justice is a strong State" definition of Justice is still unknown. Plato then changed the method of examination, his view on the city, hoping to find a greater justice in the Polis, then examine the individual small justice, see true justice. To this end, Plato built his ideal State. This implies a premise, that the concept of Justice is universal, for the city and people are the same. For classical political philosophers, the premise seems to be taken for granted was set up because they are pursuing is the general idea.

Results (English) 2:

Plato (Socrates herein can also be used instead of Plato, for the time being the difference between the two skip) "Utopia" from the "What is justice?" Begin to discuss this issue, that is to explore the definition of justice. First refuted several errors on the definition of justice, such as "justice is Qianzhaihaiqian", "justice is for everyone to appropriately reward", "justice is strong stand justice," still can not be the definition of justice and art. Plato then changed the test method, his gaze into the city, hoping to find justice in a large city, and then examine the individual who is small justice, thus see real justice. For this purpose, Plato constructed his own Utopia. In this implicit premise, namely the concept of justice is universal, for the city and the people are the same. For classical political philosophers premise seems to be taken for granted was established, because they seek is the universal concept.

Results (English) 3:

Plato (the Plato Socrates available instead, temporarily skip two difference)'s "ideal country" is from "what is justice? "This problem is discussed, that is, the definition of justice. First rejects the several error definition of justice, such as "justice is Qianzhaihuanqian", "justice is to give everyone the appropriate return", "justice is strong Li Yi", the definition of justice remains unknown. Platon then changed the method of examination, the sight of their own to the city, hoping to find a greater justice in the city, and then examine the individual's lesser justice,Thus see the true justice. For this purpose, Platon constructed his ideal state. In this implied a premise that the concept of justice is universal, for the city and people are the same. For classical political philosophers, such a premise seems to be a matter of course, because they pursue the idea of universal.