On trouvera ci-après les compétence

On trouvera ci-après les compétences à atteindre à l’issue du niveau 4.
A. Les quatre compétences
La compréhension auditive : à l’issue du niveau 4, l’étudiant doit être en mesure de :

suivre avec aisance toute prise de parole de type descriptif, explicatif, argumentatif ou injonctif

suivre une intervention longue même si elle n’est pas clairement structurée et même si les relations entre
les idées sont implicites (conférence, exposé spécialisé, discussion, débat)

compétence référentielle : comprendre les sous-entendus, l’humour, les allusions culturelles

compétence sociolinguistique : comprendre des manières de parler inhabituelles comme les accents ou
une langue non standard.
L’expression orale : à l’issue du niveau 4, l’étudiant doit être en mesure de :

communiquer avec une grande souplesse sur toutes sortes de sujets grâce à une gamme étendue de
vocabulaire et en mobilisant les registres de langue en fonction des interlocuteurs

discourir de manière claire et fluide grâce à l’utilisation d’articulateurs choisis

présenter un exposé complexe et bien construit en ayant recours à des formes linguistiques variées et
sophistiquées et en sachant répondre aisément aux questions et objections suscitées

intervenir très spontanément lors de discussions et débats grâce à des stratégies permettant de prendre
ou garder la parole (effets oratoires tels l’intonation et la mise en valeur des éléments au moyen de
l’accentuation).
La compréhension écrite : à l’issue du niveau 4, l’étudiant doit être en mesure de :

lire avec un grand degré d’autonomie des textes longs et variés de type descriptif, explicatif, interprétatif et
injonctif (tous registres)

en identifier les subtilités (attitudes, opinions explicites ou implicites)

identifier les éléments importants ainsi que les nuances argumentatives d’un texte long, reconstituer
fidèlement sa structure afin d’en restituer la synthèse.
L’expression écrite : à l’issue du niveau 4, l’étudiant doit être en mesure de :

élaborer tous types d’écrits grâce à la maîtrise des registres appropriés

construire une argumentation claire, complète et équilibrée à l’aide d’une gamme étendue de marqueurs
logiques

faire le résumé d’informations de sources diverses en recomposant les arguments avec aisance et
cohérence.
B. Les outils langagiers
Les structures suivantes seront étudiées en contexte et en tant qu’elles sont au service des compétences de
communication présentées ci-dessus. Celles qui ont déjà été abordées au niveau précédent feront l’objet d’un
approfondissement.
Département des langues
MAJ, le 24 juin 2014 16/17
La grammaire
- les nuances du système aspectuel
- le discours rapporté : concordance des temps et choix « fin » du verbe introducteur
- les noms de nombre collectifs
- les rections particulières
- les différents emplois de l’infinitif
- les tournures impersonnelles.
Le vocabulaire
(Le vocabulaire étudié privilégiera les thèmes abordés dans les autres cours mais d’autres thèmes à caractère
culturel pourront être abordés tels que livre et la littérature, l'art et les arts plastiques, le cinéma et le théâtre
etc.).
- la politique et la société
- l'économie et le commerce
- les médias, la presse, la communication
- la vie intellectuelle
- l’enseignement supérieur et la recherche
- les verbes paronymes
- les outils de préfixation et de suffixation
- les séries antonymiques comme moyen de mémorisation
- les onomatopées et les interjections
- les hypocoristiques.
La phonétique
- les constructions intonatives
- les prépositions attirant l’accent
- les mouvements d’accent dans les degrés de comparaison
- scansion poétique
- remédiation individuelle.
C. Modalités d'évaluation
L'évaluation se fait en contrôle continu durant le semestre. Cela suppose que du travail régulier est demandé
aux étudiants et qu’il est contrôlé. Il n’y a donc pas d’examen final au sens classique du terme.
1. Expression orale
L’expression orale est évaluée lors des différentes activités en conférence : ces différentes composantes de
l’enseignement interactif fait l’objet d’une note sur 20.
2. Expression écrite
L’enseignant veille à donner aux étudiants 3 travaux écrits minimum obligatoires à réaliser en dehors de la
conférence. Ces travaux doivent être répartis au mieux sur la totalité de la durée du semestre. Pour les
langues à 4 heures par semaine, le nombre de ces travaux est supérieur et selon plus de régularité.
Ces travaux feront l'objet d'une note moyenne finale sur 20.
Département des langues
MAJ, le 24 juin 2014 17/17
3. Compréhension orale
L’entraînement à la compréhension orale s’appuie sur des exercices variés de compréhension (audio et vidéo)
et fait l’objet d’une note finale sur 20.
4. Compréhension textuelle
La compréhension textuelle sera évaluée lors de différents exercices en conférence et donnera lieu à une note
sur 20.
Un test de fin de semestre pour les niveaux 0, 1, 2 et 3 est organisé la semaine 10 du semestre (il ne
s’agit pas d’un examen final mais d’une évaluation sur les acquis). Des informations sur ce test seront
transmises en temps voulu par le Département des langues. La note de ce test est prise en compte
dans la note finale du semestre.
D. Bilan de mi-parcours et évaluation finale
Les résultats à mi-semestre permettent de faire un bilan avec chaque étudiant, et de l’alerter sur ses
insuffisances éventuelles, tout en lui prodiguant des conseils sur la manière d’y remédier.
La validation d’un enseignement et donc l’obtention des crédits attachés à cet enseignement sont
acquises par l’étudiant dès lors qu’il obtient une note finale de 10/20. S’il obtient une note finale inférieure à
10/20, l’enseignement n’est pas validé et les crédits afférents ne lui sont pas accordés.
Chaque niveau est en principe prévu pour durer un semestre. Cela signifie qu’un étudiant est censé
passer au niveau suivant d’un semestre à l’autre. Cependant, certains étudiants, malgré une note finale
égale et même supérieure à 10/20, peuvent être amenés, sur décision de l’enseignant seul, à refaire un
même niveau. En effet, un étudiant peut obtenir ses crédits et avoir encore des lacunes à combler dans telle
ou telle compétence. Il peut aussi tout simplement avoir un niveau global bien trop juste pour suivre avec profit
au niveau supérieur.
Les enseignants communiquent à leurs élèves, lors du dernier cours du semestre, leur note finale ainsi que
leur passage, ou non, dans le niveau supérieur. Seul l’enseignant détermine le niveau de sortie de ses
étudiants, qui n’est pas négociable.
Les enseignants saisissent en ligne les notes finales ainsi que les appréciations qualitatives. Ces
appréciations doivent être aussi claires, précises et parlantes que possible, afin d’éviter d’éventuels recours de
la part de certains étudiants.
Document de référence :
Le Cadre Européen Commun de Référence pour les langues
Conseil de l’Europe/Les éditions Didier 2001
Le niveau 4 de Sciences Po est basé sur le C1 européen.

Results (English) 1:

The skills to achieve at the end of level 4 below.A. the four skillsListening comprehension: at the end of level 4, the student must be able to:follow with ease any taking of Word of type descriptive, explanatory, argumentative or injunctivefollow a long speech even if it is not clearly structured and even if the relationships betweenthe ideas are implied (conference, specialized lecture, discussion, debate)referential skill: understand the innuendo, humor, cultural allusionssociolinguistic competence: understanding ways to talk about unusual such as accents ora non-standard language.Oral expression: at the end of level 4, the student must be able to:communicate with flexibility on all kinds of topics through a wide range ofvocabulary and language registers according to interlocutorstalk clearly and fluid through the use of selected articulatorsa presentation complex and well constructed using a variety of linguistic forms andsophisticated and knowing respond easily to foregoing objections and questionsoccur spontaneously during discussions and debates through strategies that takeor keep the word (rhetorical effects such as intonation and the development of the elements by means of)the emphasis).Reading comprehension: at the end of level 4, the student must be able to:read with a high degree of autonomy of the long and varied type descriptive, explanatory and interpretative texts andinjunctive (all registers)identify the subtleties (attitudes, opinions expressed or implied)identify the important elements as well as the argumentative nuances of a long text, restorefaithfully its structure in order to restore the synthesis.Written expression: at the end of level 4, the student must be able to:develop all types of writings through the mastery of appropriate recordsbuild a clear, comprehensive and balanced argument using a wide range of markerslogicsummarise of information from various sources, reconstructing arguments with ease andconsistency.B. the language toolsThe following structures will be studied in the context and in so far as they are in the service of the skills ofcommunication presented above. Those that have already been discussed at the previous level will be the subject of adeepening. Department of languagesMAJ, June 24, 2014 16/17Grammar-the nuances of the aspectuel system-reported speech: concordance of time and choice 'end' of the verb introducer-collective nouns of number-the specific responses-the different uses of the infinitive-the impersonal turns of phrase.The vocabulary(Studied vocabulary will focus on topics covered in other courses but other themes to charactercultural may be addressed such as book and literature, art and the plastic arts, cinema and theatreetc.)-politics and society-economy and trade-the media, the press, communication-intellectual life-higher education and research-paronymes verbs-prefixing and suffixing tools-the antonymiques series as a means of memorization-onomatopoeia and interjections-the hypocoristiques.Phonetics-intonatives constructions-prepositions attracting emphasis-movements of accent in the degrees of comparison-poetic scansion-individual remediation.C. assessment methodsThe assessment is done in continuous monitoring during the semester. This assumes that regular work is requestedstudents and that it is controlled. Therefore, there is no final exam in the classic sense of the term.1 oral expressionThe oral expression is evaluated when the various conference activities: these different components ofinteractive teaching is the subject of a note on 20.2 written expressionThe teacher shall provide students with 3 mandatory minimum written work to be done outside of theConference. This work should be distributed to the best on the whole of the duration of the semester. For thelanguages at 4 hours per week, the number of these jobs is higher and more regularity.This work will be a final average score on 20. Department of languagesMAJ, June 24, 2014 17/173 listeningListening comprehension training builds on exercises of understanding (audio and video)and is the subject of a final score on 20.4 textual understandingTextual understanding will be evaluated during different exercises at the conference and will give rise to a note20.A test of end of semester for levels 0, 1, 2 and 3 is organized week 10 of the half (he does)is not a final review but an evaluation on the acquis). This test information will betransmitted in a timely manner by the Department of languages. Note this test is taken into accountin the final score of the half.D. assessment of mid-term and final evaluationMidterm results allow to make a balance with each student, to alert him on hisany deficiencies, providing him advice on how to address them.Validation of education and thus obtaining the credits attached to this teaching areacquired by the student as soon as he gets a final score of 10/20. If he gets a lower final score10/20, education is not validated and the appropriations are not be awarded.Each level is in principle expected to last six months. This means that a student is expected toproceed to the next semester to another level. However, some students, despite a final noteequal and even greater than 10/20, may be brought, on decision of the only teacher, to redo asame level. Indeed, a student can get his credits and still have gaps to fill in suchor such jurisdiction. It can also simply have a global level too just to keep up with profitat the top level.Teachers communicate to their pupils, during the last class of the semester, their final score as well astheir passage, or not, in the top level. Only the teacher determines the output level from itsstudents, that is not negotiable.Teachers capture online final grades as well as qualitative assessments. Theseassessments must be as clear, accurate and talking as possible, to avoid any potential use ofthe part of some students.Reference document:The common European framework of Reference for languagesCouncil of Europe / éditions Les Didier 2001The Sciences Po 4 level is based on the European C1.

Results (English) 2:

The following skills will be found to achieve at the end of Level 4.
A. The four skills
Auditory comprehension: at the end of Level 4, the student must be able
to:? follow with ease speaking any kind of descriptive, explanatory, argumentative or
injunctive? follow a long contribution even if it is not clearly structured and when relationships between
ideas are implicit (conference, presentation specialist, discussion,
debate)? referential competence: understanding innuendo, humor, cultural
allusions? sociolinguistic competence: understanding of ways of speaking as accents or unusual
non-standard language.
The oral expression: at the end of Level 4, the student must be able
to:? communicate with flexibility on all kinds of subjects with a wide range of
vocabulary and mobilizing the language registers according to the
interlocutors? talk clearly and smoothly through the use of cohesive
selected? present a complex presentation and well constructed by using various linguistic forms and
sophisticated and knowing readily respond to questions and objections
raised? very spontaneously intervene in discussions and debates with strategies to make
or keep the floor (oratorical effects such intonation and development of components using
the accent).
Reading comprehension: after the Level 4, the student must be able
to:? read with a large degree of autonomy of the long and varied texts such descriptive, explanatory, interpretative and
injunctive (all
records)? identify the subtleties (attitudes, opinions expressed or
implied)? identify important elements and argumentative nuances of a long text, reconstruct
faithfully its structure in order to reproduce the synthesis.
Written expression: at the end of Level 4, the student must be able
to:? develop all kinds of writings by mastering proper
records? build a clear argument, complete and balanced with a wide range of markers logical? to the various sources of information summarized by recomposing the arguments with ease and consistency. B. The language tools The following structures will be studied in context and as they are serving skills communication presented above. Those that have been discussed at the previous level will be a deepening. Language Department SHIFT, June 24, 2014 16/17 The grammar - shades of aspectual system - reported speech: tenses and choice "end "the verb introducer - Group number of the names - particular erections - different uses of the infinitive. - impersonal turns Vocabulary (vocabulary The study will focus on the topics covered in other courses but other character themes culture will be discussed such as books and literature, art and visual arts, film and theater etc.). - politics and society - the economy and trade - the media, the press, communication - the intellectual life - higher education and research - the paronyms verbs - the fixing of tools and suffix - the antonymiques series as a means of memorizing - onomatopoeia and interjections. - the hypocoristiques Phonetics - the intonation constructions - prepositions drawing focus - the focus movement in the degrees of comparison - poetic scansion - individual remediation. C. Assessment methods The assessment is continuous control during the semester. This implies that regular work is required for students and it is controlled. So there is no final exam in the classical sense. 1. Oral expression Oral expression is evaluated during the various conference activities: the various components of interactive teaching the subject of a note 20. 2. Writing The teacher ensures give students three written assignments minimum required to achieve outside the conference. This work should be distributed better over the entire duration of the semester. For languages ​​four hours a week, the number of jobs is greater and in more regularity. This work will be a final average score on 20. Language Department SHIFT, June 24, 2014 17/17 3 . Listening Training in oral comprehension relies on various comprehension exercises (audio and video) and is the subject of a final score of 20. 4. Textual understanding The textual comprehension will be evaluated during different exercises conference and will result in a score of 20. An end of semester test for levels 0, 1, 2 and 3 is organized week 10 of the semester (it s' is not a final examination but assessed on the achievements). Information on this test will be communicated in due course by the Department of Languages. Note this test is included in the final grade of the semester. D. Mid-term review and final evaluation results at midterm allow for a review with each student, and warn about its possible shortcomings, while providing him advice on how to address it. The validation an education and thus earns credits linked to this teaching are acquired by the student when it gets a final score of 10/20. If he gets a grade lower than 10/20, education is not validated and the appropriations are not granted. Each level is normally expected to last one semester. This means that a student is expected to move to the next level from one semester to the next. However, some students, despite a final grade equal or even greater than 10/20, may be required, by decision of the single teacher, to repeat a same level. Indeed, a student can get his credit and still have gaps in such or such jurisdiction. It can also simply be a global level too just to take full advantage of the higher level. The teachers communicate with their students during the last class of the semester, their final score and their passage or not in the top level. Only the teacher determines the output level of its students, which is not negotiable. The online teachers grasp the final scores as well as qualitative assessments. These assessments should be as clear, precise and eloquent as possible in order to avoid possible appeal by some students. Reference document: The European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​Council of Europe / Les Editions Didier 2001 Level 4 Sciences Po is based on the European C1.

Results (English) 3:

the following skills at the end of level 4. the four skills of listening comprehension: at the end of the level, the student must be able to monitor all
with ease: speaking of narrative, argumentative, or descriptive, injonctif.following a long
response, even if it is not clearly structured and the relationship between the ideas are implicit (conference presentation, special discussion, debate, reference)
competence: understanding the implication, humour, cultural allusions.
sociolinguistic competence: understanding the unusual ways to talk about the words ora non-standard language. oral expression: after level 4, the student should be able to:
provide flexibility on all sorts of subjects with a wide range of vocabulary and the language using, on whom
speak clearly and smoothly through the use of cohesive devices selected.
present complex and well constructed using various linguistic forms and sophisticated, and respond readily to questions and opposition.
occur spontaneously during discussions and debates in ways that take or keep the floor (such as intonation and speech enhancement features by means offurther reading:). at the end of level 4, the student should be able to:
read with a large degree of autonomy of the various type of long texts and explanatory, interpretive, and injonctif (records)
identify subtleties (attitudes, opinions expressed or implicit).
identify important elements as well as the argumentation of grades text, to reconstruct accurately the structure. in order to restore the synthesis. the written word. at the end of the level, the student must be able to:
develop all kinds of writings by controlling appropriate records,
building a clear arguments.a comprehensive and balanced with the aid of a range of markers (logical)
can summarise information from different sources, reconstructing arguments with ease and consistency. b. the language tools, the structures will be examined in context, and as long as they are in the service of the communication skills of above.those who have already been discussed at the previous level, will be the subject of a process. the department of languages, maj, 24 june 2014. 16 / 17) and the nuances of grammar system. aspectuel speech tenses and reported: "the end" of the verb. the names of the directors, the group number and the specific directions and positions in the infinitivethe impersonal turns of phrase. "the vocabulary (the vocabulary study will focus on the topics covered in the course, but other subjects will be discussed, such as the cultural and literature, art and the plastic arts, cinema and theatre, etc.). politics and society. the economy and trade and the media, the press, communication.the intellectual life of the higher education and research. the verbs paronymes - tools for fixing and suffixation
- series as a means of storing the antonyms of the sounds the basis and the hypocoristiques. phonetics. construction intonatives - attracting focus - prepositions the movement of the focus on the degrees of comparison- - individual poetic line scan correction. methods of evaluation, the evaluation is done by monitoring during the semester. this implies that the work is requested, the students, and it is controlled. there is no final examination in the traditional sense of the term. "1. oral expression, oral expression is evaluated in different activities in the conference.the various components of the interactive teaching is the subject of a footnote 20.) 2. the teacher is writing to give the students to achieve the minimum 3 written papers out of the "conference. this work should be distributed in the entire duration of the semester. for the languages to be 4 hours a week.the number of these works is higher and more regular in. this work will be the subject of a final average score of 20. the department of languages, maj, 24 june 2014 (17 / 17). listening comprehension, listening training is based on different periods of understanding (audio and video) and is subject to a final score of 20. 4. text understanding.the understanding of text is evaluated at different years in conference and will give rise to a note on 20. a test at the end of semester, the levels 0, 1, 2, and 3 is held the week of the semester, there was not a final review and evaluation of the achievements.. information on the test will be sent in a timely manner and in the department of languages.note that the test is taken into account in the final score of the half. the mid-term review and final evaluation of the results to provide a midterm review to each student, and the alert on its' shortcomings, giving advice on how to address.validation of a teaching and therefore the funds committed to teaching are acquired by the student as soon as he gets a score of 10 / 20. if there is a final score of less than - 10 / 20, the instruction is not validated and the funds are not available. each level is expected to last a year.this means that a student is supposed to "take it to the next level of one half to the other. however, some of the students, despite the final score, equal and exceed 10 / 20 may, upon decision of the teacher, to do a same level. in fact, a student may receive credits and have some shortcomings in such or such jurisdiction.it may also simply be a global level too just to keep up with the higher profit level. teachers communicate with students, in the last class of the semester, the final score, as well as "them or not, at the higher level. the teacher determines the output level of the students, which is not negotiable.the teachers are the final scores, as well as in the qualitative assessment. these findings should also be clear, accurate and clear as possible, in order to avoid the potential use of some students. (reference: "the common european framework of reference for languages and the council of europe, 2001, editions didier.level 4 sci is based on c1.