Results (
Thai) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
Induction of labor, an increasingly common intervention, is oftenpreceded by the application of an agent to “prime” or “ripen” the cervix. We conducted arandomized controlled trial to compare clinical, economic, and psychosocial outcomes ofinpatient and outpatient cervical priming before induction of labor. In this paper we presentthe psychosocial outcomes. Methods: Women participating in a randomized controlled trialin two Australian metropolitan teaching hospitals completed questionnaires to measureanxiety and depression at enrollment, and to examine satisfaction, experiences, depression,and infant feeding 7 weeks after giving birth. Data analysis was by intention to treat and byhaving received the intervention as intended (approximately 50% in each group). Results: Of1,004 eligible women, 85 percent consented (n = 407, outpatient; n = 414 inpatient). Nostatistically significant or clinically relevant differences were found in immediate anxiety,depression, or infant feeding. Small, statistically significant differences favoring outpatientpriming were found in seven of the nine subscales in the 7-week postpartum questionnaire.The direction of the effect was maintained, mostly with a larger effect size in women whoreceived the intervention. Conclusion: Women allocated to outpatient priming were moresatisfied with their priming experience than women allocated to inpatient priming. Beingทราบว่า พวกเขาสามารถกลับบ้านหลังจากปากมดลูกด้วยก็เพิ่มความวิตกกังวลของผู้หญิง
Being translated, please wait..
