Я спросила своих одноклассников, хо

Я спросила своих одноклассников, хорошо ли это, если на планете только один язык. Вот лишь два мнения из тридцати:
«Это было бы очень хорошо. Не надо было бы мучиться с изучением нескольких языков, пользоваться ужасными компьютерными переводчиками. Да и жизнь была бы легче. Бизнесмены могли бы проводить переговоры без лишних людей, иностранцы бы не шутили над тобой на непонятном тебе наречии, а домохозяйки могли бы болтать с подругами в какой-нибудь Зимбабве».
«Даже не знаю. С одной стороны, это даже здорово, в Корее бы все меня понимали. А с другой ... Это ведь может быть не русский, а английский, тогда все гораздо сложнее. Хотя... Английский мы в школе учим, справились бы. Одно знаю точно, на русском буду говорить до конца своих дней».
Таким образом, мы можем сделать несколько выводов:
1. Язык, в том числе и литературный, отражает культуру народа, на нем говорящего.
2. У современных языков были праязыки, гораздо с большей распространённостью.
3. Сегодня в мире вымирают малораспространенные языки, в первую очередь, языки не обладающие письменностью.
4. Один глобальный язык на планете будет отнюдь не завтра.
5. Нынешнее поколение считает довольно неплохой возможность общения на одном глобальном языке.

Results (English) 1:

I asked their classmates, does this well if only one language on the planet. Here are two views of the thirty:"It would be very good. Not to fret with the study of several languages, use the horrible computer translators. Yes, life would be easier. Businessmen could negotiate without any people, foreigners were not joking above you in an incomprehensible language, and housewives you could chat with your girlfriends in a Zimbabwe. ""I don't even know. On the one hand, it's even great in Korea I would understand. And, on the other ... It may not be Russian and English, then everything is much more complicated. Though ... English school we teach, would have coped. One thing I know for sure, I will speak in English until the end of his days ".In this way, we can make several conclusions:1. Language and literature, reflects the culture of the people there speaking.2. the modern languages were praâzyki, much more prevalence.3. in the world today are dying out less common languages, particularly languages have no written language.4. one global language on the planet is not tomorrow.5. the present generation finds quite a good opportunity to communicate on a single global language.

Results (English) 2:

I asked my classmates, whether it is good, if the world only one language. Here are just two of the thirty opinion:
"It would be very good. Would not have to suffer with the study of multiple languages, use the horrible computer translators. And life would be easier. Businessmen could negotiate without extra people, foreigners would not joke on you in an incomprehensible dialect you and housewives could chat with friends in some of Zimbabwe. "
"I do not know. On the one hand, it's even great in Korea would all understand me. On the other hand ... It's perhaps not Russian, and English, while more complicated. Although ... English we teach in school, would manage. One thing I know for sure, I will speak in Russian to the end of his days. "
Thus, we can draw several conclusions:
1. Language, including literature, reflects the culture of the people speaking it.
2. Modern languages ​​were proto much more common.
3. Today in the world are dying less common languages, especially languages ​​do not have writing.
4. One global language on the planet will not tomorrow.
5. The present generation finds a pretty good ability to communicate in one global language.

Results (English) 3:

I ask their classmates, whether it is good, if on this planet only one language. There are two views from thirty:
"that is very good. Don't, it will be for learning languages,Terrible computer translator enjoyment. Yes, life would be easier. Traders can hold talks, no extra people, foreigners don't make fun of you in our society, society and has customers from m from your statement,While housewife chat friend can be in any faith. Faith's spring m e
"don't even know you. On the one hand, it even in South Korea's all great, I'll understand. On the other hand... This is because can not Russian, english,Then all the more complicated. Although... We teach English in a school, will handle. One knows the exact said, Russia will end his days.
therefore, we can draw several conclusions as follows:
1. Language,Including literature, reflects the culture of the people, it can talk.
2. I was on the modern language studies. 3 for hallux kappa me, more studies. C on the P increased in our society, studies. The same energy-saving, energy-saving
3 die. In today's a pi from studies. C P, energy-saving energy-saving studies. Foreign investor allus e language dying out in the world,First of all, the language has no word.
4. A global language on this planet, nor tomorrow.
5. The current generation of thought, in a fairly good global English language exchange opportunities.