In the theology it may be that the

In the theology it may be that the chief artific person is the church, but in
Juisprudence the chief artificial person is the State, The State is an artificial person created in order that by assuming it as organs are men engaged in protecting a mass of human beings from extemal and internal fraud and violence, a unity of operation may be given to those organs.
who creates the State and on what basis does its continuous existence rest?
In every aggregation of men, here are some of the members who impress their
will upon the others, who are habitually obeyed by the and who are, in truth, the rulers of the society. The sources from which their authority flows are of the most diersk character. They may be, or may pretend to be , divinely inspired. It may be their physical strength, their wisdon, their cunning, their virtue, their vices ,oftenest, perhaps, their assiduity and persistence that have given them their power. The sources of this power are indeed. so various, and its mode of action so subtle and often unknown even by those who exercise it. that it is impossible to define or

closely trace it

(3) It is some time said that State is the creature of the people. This is
the
untrue if it is meant that, as a fact, the people uphold it. The people, in that, as in other

things, exercise no power
against those, to whom they have subjected their wills. The

people no more have created and uphold the state because they have the physical

Results (English) 1:

In the theology it may be that the chief artific person is the church, but inJuisprudence the chief artificial person is the State, The State is an artificial person created in order that by assuming it as organs are men engaged in protecting a mass of human beings from extemal and internal fraud and violence, a unity of operation may be given to those organs.who creates the State and on what basis does its continuous existence rest?In every aggregation of men, here are some of the members who impress theirwill upon the others, who are habitually obeyed by thee and who are, in truth, the rulers of the society. The sources from which their authority flows are of the most diersk character. They may be, or may pretend to be, divinely inspired. It may be their physical strength, their wisdon, their cunning, their virtue, their vices, oftenest, perhaps, their assiduity and persistence that have given them their power. The sources of this power are indeed. so various, and its mode of action so subtle and often unknown even by those who exercise it. that it is impossible to define orclosely trace it(3) It is some time said that State is the creature of the people. This isthe untrue if it is meant that, as a fact, the people uphold it. The people, in that, as in otherthings, exercise no poweragainst those, to whom they have subjected their wills. Thepeople no more have created and uphold the state because they have the physical

Results (English) 3:

在神学可能主要艺术的人是教堂，但在
juisprudence行政法人是国家，国家是为了通过假设它作为器官的人从事保护大量的从外部和内部的欺诈和暴力的人的法人，统一操作可以给那些
器官。谁创造了国家和其上的持续存在，其余的依据什么？
在各人的聚集，这里的一些人留下深刻的印象，他们
会对别人，谁都习惯性地遵循的是谁，事实上，社会的统治者。来源于他们的权威流量是最diersk字符。他们可能是，或可能假装，神圣的启示。这可能是他们的体力，他们的智慧，他们的狡猾，他们的美德，他们的罪恶，一般，也许，他们的勤勉和毅力，给他们力量。这种权力的来源是。因此，其作用方式不同，所以即使是那些谁行使它微妙的，往往是未知的。它是不可能定义或

密切跟踪

（3）这是一段时间说，国家是人民的生物。这是不真实的

是否意味着，作为一个事实，人们坚持。的人，在那，在其他

的东西，没有权力
反对，他们使他们的意志。该

人们没有更多的创造和维护状态，因为他们的物理