津留崎＠PASAPです。 お世話になります。 ２ページの資料では、FP

津留崎＠PASAPです。
お世話になります。

２ページの資料では、FPCをTFT基板と接続した状態に
なっています。
本体で測定した状態では難しそうなので、同様にFPCとNAVI基板
を接続した状態での測定もお願いします。
両測定方法とも最初にFPCのインピーダンスが見える形になるので
御社の測定データ相当になると考えられ、コネクタ以降でどうなるか
ですが、御社で測定していただいた結果が、現在の測定結果からの
コメント以上のものが無いとなると、今回の依頼する目的を失ってしまい
ます。

また、その後の要因解析につきましても検討中です
⇒とあり、前回のメールで検討をしていただいているようですが、
より踏み込んだコメントがいただけそうでしょうか？

宜しくお願いします。

以上

Results (English) 1:

It is a @PASAP. You will be staying. In a two-page article connects TFT substrate and FPC Has become. So difficult in the State were measured in the body as well as FPC with NAVI Board Thank you also measure in the connected state. Be visible first FPC impedance with both measuring methods Considered equivalent to measuring data of your company to be a connector or later? Is your measurements in your company, but from the current measurement results I lost the purpose would not comment more than to ask this Will. It is also under consideration for later analysis ⇒ with and, in the previous mail are received to study, More in-depth comments just so you will do? Thank you in advance. More than

Results (English) 2:

Tsurusaki is @PASAP.
Thank you for your help.

In a two-page article, the state of connecting the FPC to the TFT substrate
has become.
Since the difficulties likely in the state measured by the body, as well as FPC and NAVI board
also thank you measure in a state in which to connect the.
First since to form the impedance of the FPC can be seen in both the measurement method
is considered to be in your company's measurement data equivalent, what happens in the following connector
I, a result that had you measured in your company, from the current measurement result
Comments When it comes to there is no more than, lose the purpose for which the request of this time
will.

Moreover, it is under consideration also regarding subsequent factor analysis
is with ⇒, but it seems that if I have to consider in the last e-mail,
or would be likely to offer more-depth comment?

Thanking you in advance.

that's all