我个人观点认为,联合国从一开始初期一直慢慢的介入海地给予各个方面的支助,是相当好的,但是说成不成功,以总体我觉得并还达不到成功之说,因为并没 translation - 我个人观点认为,联合国从一开始初期一直慢慢的介入海地给予各个方面的支助,是相当好的,但是说成不成功,以总体我觉得并还达不到成功之说,因为并没 English how to say

我个人观点认为,联合国从一开始初期一直慢慢的介入海地给予各个方面的支助

我个人观点认为,联合国从一开始初期一直慢慢的介入海地给予各个方面的支助,是相当好的,但是说成不成功,以总体我觉得并还达不到成功之说,因为并没有使海地经济,社会安全,医药卫生恢复到正常的国家。 但是如果没有联合国与其他国家的及时外援,真的是不能想象海地会变成什么样子的国家。
但是由于海地原本就是一个贫苦国家,海地政府已经欠下大笔的外债,国家社会安全都动荡不安,当地人民大多数又是文盲,因此在援救方面相当辛苦,需要给予更多的援助。例如2010年海地发生大地震,10万人失去原有的家园,联合国与其他的国家外援给予许多的资金与医药各个方面的援助,但是海地当地人民一直依赖着外援的帮助,并没有想重返自己家园的意愿。当地人民大多因为都是文盲,当救灾物品一送到集货地区时,那些灾民就争先恐后的争夺救灾物品,也因为如此发生了踩踏时间,让更加多的无辜送命。也就因为如此,让整个救援工作雪上加霜。我认为要更好的解决当地经济问题,我个人觉得应该考虑当地的自然资源,例如开发咖啡,农业等等。让人民有能力自己自足,以及给予更多教育方面的建设,提高人民的知识水平。而不是一直依赖着外援,这也只是治标不治本的。所以我认为整体上,联合国对海地采取的一切决议与措施,只是缓和之计,并没有达到治本的效果,海地当地人民还生活在贫苦与艰难的环境之中。但是我相信联合国还在继续努力着。
0/5000
From: -
To: -
Results (English) 1: [Copy]
Copied!
我个人观点认为,联合国从一开始初期一直慢慢的介入海地给予各个方面的支助,是相当好的,但是说成不成功,以总体我觉得并还达不到成功之说,因为并没有使海地经济,社会安全,医药卫生恢复到正常的国家。 但是如果没有联合国与其他国家的及时外援,真的是不能想象海地会变成什么样子的国家。 但是由于海地原本就是一个贫苦国家,海地政府已经欠下大笔的外债,国家社会安全都动荡不安,当地人民大多数又是文盲,因此在援救方面相当辛苦,需要给予更多的援助。例如2010年海地发生大地震,10万人失去原有的家园,联合国与其他的国家外援给予许多的资金与医药各个方面的援助,但是海地当地人民一直依赖着外援的帮助,并没有想重返自己家园的意愿。当地人民大多因为都是文盲,当救灾物品一送到集货地区时,那些灾民就争先恐后的争夺救灾物品,也因为如此发生了踩踏时间,让更加多的无辜送命。也就因为如此,让整个救援工作雪上加霜。我认为要更好的解决当地经济问题,我个人觉得应该考虑当地的自然资源,例如开发咖啡,农业等等。让人民有能力自己自足,以及给予更多教育方面的建设,提高人民的知识水平。而不是一直依赖着外援,这也只是治标不治本的。所以我认为整体上,联合国对海地采取的一切决议与措施,只是缓和之计,并没有达到治本的效果,海地当地人民还生活在贫苦与艰难的环境之中。但是我相信联合国还在继续努力着。
Being translated, please wait..
Results (English) 2:[Copy]
Copied!
My personal view is that the United Nations from the outset has been slowly beginning to give support to all aspects of the intervention in Haiti is quite good, but said to be successful, and I think in general has not yet reached the success of that because there is no the Haitian economy, social security, medical and health back to normal state. But without timely aid of the United Nations and other countries, Haiti really can not imagine what will become of the country.
However, because Haiti is a poor country originally, the Haitian government has an enormous amount of debt owed ​​to the National Social Security are in turmoil, the majority of the local population is illiterate, so the rescue aspect quite hard, need to be given more assistance. Such as the 2010 Haiti earthquake, 100,000 people lose their homes, and the United Nations to give financial assistance to many of the various aspects of medicine and other national foreign aid, but Haiti has been dependent on local people helping foreign aid, and did not want to return their homes will. Most of the local people because they were illiterate, while relief items to set a cargo area, who vied with each other in the fight for victims relief goods, but also because this time the stampede occurred, so that more and more innocent people killed. Partly because of this, the whole rescue work worse. I think a better solution to the local economy, I personally think we should take account of local natural resources, such as the development of coffee, agriculture and so on. Let the people have the ability to self-sufficiency, as well as giving to build more education, improve the level of knowledge of the people. But not always dependent on foreign aid, this is only a temporary solution. So I think on the whole, the effect of all decisions and measures taken by the United Nations in Haiti, just to ease the plan, and did not reach the root of the problem, local people still living in the Haitian poor and difficult environment. But I believe that the United Nations continues to work with.
Being translated, please wait..
Results (English) 3:[Copy]
Copied!
My personal view is that United Nations from the start early has been slowly involved in Haiti has given all aspects of support, is quite good, but said to success is not, in general I think and has not yet reached the success, because there is no the Haitian economy, social security, Wei pharmaceutical students returned to the normal state. But if there is no United Nations and other countries in time of foreign aid, really can not imagine what Haiti will become the country.
but due to Haiti was originally a poor country, the Haitian government already owes a lot of foreign debts, national social security in turmoil, local people majority illiterate,So in the rescue of the very hard, need to give more aid. For example the 2010 Haiti earthquake, 10 million people lost their original home, the United Nations and other countries foreign aid to give a lot of cash and medical aspects of aid, but local people in Haiti been dependent on the help of foreign aid, did not want to return to their homeland will. Local people mostly because are illiterate, when relief supplies arrived in the cargo area, those victims is scrambling for relief goods, because of this the time stamping, let more innocent lives. And so, let the whole rescue work worse.I think it is better to solve the local economic problems, I personally think it should take into account the local natural resources, such as the development of coffee, agriculture, etc.. Let people have the ability to be self-sufficient, as well as to give more education, improve the knowledge level of the people. Rather than rely on foreign aid, this is only a palliative. So I think overall, United Nations to Haiti to take decisions and measures just ease account, did not achieve the effect a permanent cure, Haiti local people also live in poverty and difficult environment. But I believe the United Nations is still working on it.
Being translated, please wait..
 
Other languages
The translation tool support: Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Detect language, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Frisian, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hawaiian, Hebrew, Hindi, Hmong, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Maori, Marathi, Mongolian, Myanmar (Burmese), Nepali, Norwegian, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Samoan, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Spanish, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Xhosa, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Language translation.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: