Results (
English) 3:
[Copy]Copied!
My personal view is that United Nations from the start early has been slowly involved in Haiti has given all aspects of support, is quite good, but said to success is not, in general I think and has not yet reached the success, because there is no the Haitian economy, social security, Wei pharmaceutical students returned to the normal state. But if there is no United Nations and other countries in time of foreign aid, really can not imagine what Haiti will become the country.
but due to Haiti was originally a poor country, the Haitian government already owes a lot of foreign debts, national social security in turmoil, local people majority illiterate,So in the rescue of the very hard, need to give more aid. For example the 2010 Haiti earthquake, 10 million people lost their original home, the United Nations and other countries foreign aid to give a lot of cash and medical aspects of aid, but local people in Haiti been dependent on the help of foreign aid, did not want to return to their homeland will. Local people mostly because are illiterate, when relief supplies arrived in the cargo area, those victims is scrambling for relief goods, because of this the time stamping, let more innocent lives. And so, let the whole rescue work worse.I think it is better to solve the local economic problems, I personally think it should take into account the local natural resources, such as the development of coffee, agriculture, etc.. Let people have the ability to be self-sufficient, as well as to give more education, improve the knowledge level of the people. Rather than rely on foreign aid, this is only a palliative. So I think overall, United Nations to Haiti to take decisions and measures just ease account, did not achieve the effect a permanent cure, Haiti local people also live in poverty and difficult environment. But I believe the United Nations is still working on it.
Being translated, please wait..
