AbstractThe paper aims at evaluatin

Abstract
The paper aims at evaluating the impact of the tasks’ allocation between human and machine on the efficiency of work systems in the healthcare domain. Usability testing was performed to compare two different tasks’ allocations depending on two different systems (semi-automated system vs. manual system) for the tasks of preparing and administering the drugs in hospital settings. The results show that the allocation of tasks with the semi-automated system seems to produce a better performance in terms of task durations compared to the manual cabinet. Concerning safety goals, the semi-automated system seems to fix known common errors generated by the manual system. But it seems also to bring new errors more numerous that can be easily fixed. The main problem highlighted by the study lies in the risks of automation exposure over time. After a one-hour simulation, participants already have the feeling of loss of control and present a disengagement. The tasks’ allocation with the semi-automated system changes in fact the nature of the feedback provided to nurses and then under-specifies the cognitive operations of nurses. Design recommendations were given in order to give back part of the control to nurses through the reallocation of tasks.

Results (English) 3:

摘要本文旨在评价人与机器之间的任务分配对医疗保健领域工作效率的影响。可用性测试进行比较2个不同的任务的分配，这取决于不同的系统（半自动化系统与人工系统）的任务，准备和管理的药物在医院的设置。结果表明，分配的任务与半自动化系统似乎产生一个更好的性能方面的任务持续时间相比，手动柜。关于安全的目标，半自动化系统似乎是已知的常见错误所产生的手动系统。但它似乎也带来新的错误更大量，可以很容易地固定。突出的研究的主要问题在于自动化曝光的风险随着时间的推移。经过一一小时的模拟，参与者已经失去控制的感觉，并提出了一个脱离接触。任务的分配与半自动化系统的变化，事实上的性质的反馈给护士，然后根据指定的认知操作的护士。给出了设计建议，为了给后面的控制部分，护士通过任务的分配。